Skip to content
TRP
Cyberbullying and Law Enforcement

TRP Newsroom / Main Feed

Cyberbullying and Law Enforcement

37

by Brandon Burley and The Redemption Project Cyberbullying cases often become difficult because schools, parents, and law enforcement do not always operate from the same threshold. A disciplinary issue, a harmful message, and a criminal standard are not automatically the same thing; even when the pressure feels immediate. I am a retired detective and criminal justice / government educator based in Tennessee. I am a commentary write for Tennessee Lookout and a weekly columnist with Knox TN Today . My work examines public policy, public safety systems and civic responsibility. My reporting and commentary have also appeared in Governing , The Arizona Capitol Times , South Florida Sun Sentinel , Police1 , among other state and regional outlets. Get full access to The Redemption Project Newsroom at newsroom.theredemptionproject.news/subscribe

Cyberbullying and Law Enforcement

Playback continues in the player bar at the bottom of the screen.

Related Episodes

The Question We Rarely Ask After Prison

TRP Newsroom / Main Feed

The Question We Rarely Ask After Prison

by Brandon Burley and The Redemption Project Most criminal justice debate focuses on sentencing and incarceration. Far less attention is given to what happens after release, even though that is often where public safety outcomes are shaped most directly. We still measure criminal justice at the wrong moment. Most public debate focuses on sentencing, incarceration levels, and whether a punishment sounds tough enough. But the most important question usually begins after someone leaves prison or jail. That is because most people who are incarcerated will eventually return to their communities, and the first year after release is often the most unstable part of the entire process. Housing problems, unemployment, untreated addiction, and weak supervision can all collide at once. When that happens, repeat offending often begins long before the next arrest ever appears in public statistics. That is why criminal justice is not really tested in the courtroom. It is tested after release, when structure becomes thinner and risk becomes real. A sentence may end on paper, but risk often begins where structure weakens. For many people, what happens after release determines whether reform becomes real or remains theoretical. The courtroom matters. But public safety is often decided later. I am a retired detective and criminal justice / government educator based in Tennessee. I am a commentary write for Tennessee Lookout and a weekly columnist with Knox TN Today . My work examines public policy, public safety systems and civic responsibility. My reporting and commentary have also appeared in Governing , The Arizona Capitol Times , South Florida Sun Sentinel , Police1 , among other state and regional outlets. Get full access to The Redemption Project Newsroom at newsroom.theredemptionproject.news/subscribe

S0 E7
88
Open episodeWatch
Also available on
  • Substack
  • YouTube
  • Apple Podcasts(Coming soon)
  • Spotify(Coming soon)
  • iHeartRadio(Coming soon)
  • Amazon Music(Coming soon)
Arizona’s fentanyl response often gets discussed through enforcement numbers.

TRP Newsroom / Main Feed

Arizona’s fentanyl response often gets discussed through enforcement numbers.

by Brandon Burley and The Redemption Project Arizona’s fentanyl response often gets discussed through enforcement numbers. But forensic systems carry another side of the burden: identifying compounds, confirming toxicology, and keeping pace with changing chemistry. Those pressures do not always rise at the same speed. I am a retired detective and criminal justice / government educator based in Tennessee. I am a commentary write for Tennessee Lookout and a weekly columnist with Knox TN Today . My work examines public policy, public safety systems and civic responsibility. My reporting and commentary have also appeared in Governing , The Arizona Capitol Times , South Florida Sun Sentinel , Police1 , among other state and regional outlets. Get full access to The Redemption Project Newsroom at newsroom.theredemptionproject.news/subscribe

S0 E3
50
Open episodeWatch
Also available on
  • Substack
  • YouTube
  • Apple Podcasts(Coming soon)
  • Spotify(Coming soon)
  • iHeartRadio(Coming soon)
  • Amazon Music(Coming soon)
Why New Opioids Stay Hidden

TRP Newsroom / Main Feed

Why New Opioids Stay Hidden

by Brandon Burley and The Redemption Project A newly emerging synthetic opioid identified in Tennessee, Canada, and parts of Europe is highlighting a larger forensic challenge: surveillance systems often only detect what laboratories are already built to recognize. A new synthetic opioid is now forcing a bigger question across multiple countries: how often do new drugs spread before public systems fully catch them? The compound is called cychlorphine. It has already appeared in overdose investigations, forensic laboratories, and seized drug supplies in places including Tennessee, Canada, and parts of Europe. In Tennessee, forensic officials have linked it to multiple deaths under investigation, and the drug has been described as roughly ten times more potent than fentanyl. But the larger issue is not just the drug itself. Many overdose dashboards only show what laboratories are already built to detect. If a new compound is not part of routine testing, it can circulate long before official numbers fully reflect what is happening. That means chemistry can move faster than surveillance. Across multiple jurisdictions, cychlorphine has already shown how differently detection systems move depending on forensic design. In Canada, federal laboratory systems identified the compound and incorporated it into routine screening after validation through Health Canada’s Drug Analysis Service. In parts of Europe, early warning systems allowed laboratories to report detections before mortality data fully reflected the substance. In the United States, forensic identification often depends on state and regional laboratory workflows, which means detection can vary by jurisdiction even when seized drug material appears elsewhere. That creates a practical gap. A compound may already exist inside supply chains while public dashboards remain largely silent. Forensic laboratories often see chemical change first. Public systems usually catch up later. As synthetic opioid chemistry continues evolving, the central question is no longer only how dangerous a new compound may be, but how quickly institutions designed for detection can recognize what has changed. In that environment, surveillance is no longer only a reporting function. It is part of public health readiness. I am a retired detective and criminal justice / government educator based in Tennessee. I am a commentary write for Tennessee Lookout and a weekly columnist with Knox TN Today . My work examines public policy, public safety systems and civic responsibility. My reporting and commentary have also appeared in Governing , The Arizona Capitol Times , South Florida Sun Sentinel , Police1 , among other state and regional outlets. Get full access to The Redemption Project Newsroom at newsroom.theredemptionproject.news/subscribe

S0 E2
54
Open episodeWatch
Also available on
  • Substack
  • YouTube
  • Apple Podcasts(Coming soon)
  • Spotify(Coming soon)
  • iHeartRadio(Coming soon)
  • Amazon Music(Coming soon)